Class 7 Maths Chapter 8 Notes Working with Fractions
Class 7 Maths Notes Chapter 8 – Class 7 Working with Fractions Notes
→ Brahmagupta’s formula for multiplication of fractions:
\(\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a \times c}{b \times d}\)
→ When multiplying fractions, if the numerators and denominators have some common factors, we can cancel them first before multiplying the numerators and denominators.
→ In multiplication, the product is less than the other number when one of the numbers being multiplied is between 0 and 1. If one of the numbers being multiplied is greater than 1, then the product is greater than the other.
→ The reciprocal of a fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) is \(\frac{b}{a}\). When we multiply a fraction by its reciprocal, the product is 1.
→ Brahmagupta’s formula for division of fractions:
\(\frac{a}{b} \div \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{d}{c}=\frac{a \times d}{b \times c}\)
→ In division, when the divisor is between 0 and 1, the quotient is greater than the dividend. When the divisor is greater than 1, the quotient is less than the dividend.
Multiplication of Fractions Class 7 Notes
Aaron walks 3 kilometres in 1 hour. How far can he walk in 5 hours?
This is a simple question. We know that to find the distance, we need to find the product of 5 and 3, i.e., we multiply 5 and 3.
Distance covered in 1 hour = 3 km.
Therefore, the Distance covered in 5 hours = 5 × 3 km
= 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 + 3 km
= 15 km.
Aaron’s pet tortoise walks at a much slower pace. It can walk only \(\frac{1}{4}\) kilometre in 1 hour. How far can it walk in 3 hours?
Here, the distance covered in an hour is a fraction. This does not matter.
The total distance covered is calculated in the same way as multiplication.
Distance covered in 1 hour = \(\frac{1}{4}\) km.
Therefore, distance covered in 3 hours = 3 × \(\frac{1}{4}\) km
= \(\frac{1}{4}\) + \(\frac{1}{4}\) + \(\frac{1}{4}\) km
= \(\frac{3}{4}\) km.
The tortoise can walk \(\frac{3}{4}\) km in 3 hours.
Let us consider a case where the time spent walking is a fraction of an hour.
We saw that Aaron can walk 3 kilometres in 1 hour. How far can he walk in \(\frac{1}{5}\) hours?
We continue to calculate the total distance covered through multiplication.
Distance covered in \(\frac{1}{5}\) hours = \(\frac{1}{5}\) × 3 km.
Finding the product:
Distance covered in 1 hour = 3 km.
In \(\frac{1}{5}\) hours, the distance covered is equal to the length we get by dividing 3 km into 5 equal parts, which is \(\frac{3}{5}\) km.
This tells us that \(\frac{1}{5}\) × 3 = \(\frac{3}{5}\)
How far can Aaron walk in \(\frac{2}{5}\) hours?
Once again, we have—
Distance covered = \(\frac{2}{5}\) × 3 km.
Finding the Product:
1. We can first find the distance covered in \(\frac{1}{5}\) hours.
2. Since the duration \(\frac{2}{5}\) is twice \(\frac{1}{5}\), we multiply this distance by 2 to get the total distance covered.
Here is the calculation.
Distance covered in 1 hour = 3 km.
1. Distance covered in \(\frac{1}{5}\) hour
= The length we get by dividing 3 km into 5 equal parts
= \(\frac{3}{5}\) km.
2. Multiplying this distance by 2, we get
2 × \(\frac{3}{5}\) = \(\frac{6}{5}\) km.
From this, we can see that
\(\frac{2}{5}\) × 3 = \(\frac{6}{5}\)
Discussion
We did this multiplication as follows:
First, we divided the multiplicand, 3, by the denominator of the multiplier, 5, to get \(\frac{3}{5}\)
We then multiplied the result by the numerator of the multiplier, that is 2, to get \(\frac{6}{5}\).
Thus, whenever we need to multiply a fraction and a whole number, we follow the steps above.
Example 1.
A farmer had 5 grandchildren. She distributed \(\frac{2}{3}\) acre of land to each of her grandchildren. How much land in all did she give to her grandchildren?
\(5 \times \frac{2}{3}=\frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{3}+\frac{2}{3}=\frac{10}{3} \)
Example 2.
1 hour of internet time costs ₹ 8. How much will 1\(\frac{1}{4}\) hours of internet time cost?
1\(\frac{1}{4}\) hours is \(\frac{5}{4}\) hours (converting from a mixed fraction).
Cost of \(\frac{5}{4}\) hour of internet time = \(\frac{5}{4}\) × 8
= 5 × \(\frac{8}{4}\)
= 5 × 2
= 10
It costs ₹ 10 for 1\(\frac{1}{4}\) hours of internet time.
Multiplying Two Fractions
We know that Aaron’s pet tortoise can walk only \(\frac{1}{4}\) km in 1 hour. How far can it walk in half an hour?
Following our approach of using multiplication to solve such problems, we have,
Distance covered in \(\frac{1}{2}\) hour = \(\frac{1}{2}\) × \(\frac{1}{4}\) km.
Finding the product:
Distance covered in 1 hour = \(\frac{1}{4}\) km.
Therefore, the distance covered in \(\frac{1}{2}\) an hour is the length we get by
dividing \(\frac{1}{4}\) into 2 equal parts.
To find this, it is useful to represent fractions using the unit square to stand for a “whole”.
Now we divide this \(\frac{1}{4}\) into 2 equal parts. What do we get?
What fraction of the whole is shaded?
Since the whole is divided into 8 equal parts and one of the parts is shaded, we can say that \(\frac{1}{8}\) of the whole is shaded.
So, the distance covered by the tortoise in half an hour is \(\frac{1}{8}\) km.
This tells us that \(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{8}\).
If the tortoise walks faster and it can cover \(\frac{2}{5}\) km in 1 hour, how far will it walk in \(\frac{3}{4}\) of an hour?
Distance covered = \(\frac{3}{4}\) × \(\frac{2}{5}\)
Finding the Product:
(i) First, find the distance covered in \(\frac{1}{4}\) of an hour.
Distance in km covered in \(\frac{1}{4}\) of an hour = The quantity we get by dividing \(\frac{2}{5}\) into 4 equal parts.
Taking the unit square as the whole, the shaded part (in Fig.) is a region we get when we divide \(\frac{2}{5}\) into 4 equal parts.
How much of the whole is it?
The whole is divided into 5 rows and 4 columns, creating 5 × 4 = 20 equal parts.
Number of these parts shaded = 2.
So, the distance covered in \(\frac{1}{4}\) of an hour = \(\frac{2}{20}\).
(ii) Multiply the result by 3, to get the distance covered in \(\frac{3}{4}\) of an hour.
Now, we need to multiply \(\frac{2}{20}\) by 3.
Distance covered in \(\frac{3}{4}\) of an hour = 3 × \(\frac{2}{20}\) = \(\frac{6}{20}\)
So, \(\frac{3}{4} \times \frac{2}{5}=\frac{6}{20}=\frac{3}{10}\)
Discussion
In the case of a fraction multiplied by another fraction, we follow a method similar to the one we used when we multiplied a fraction by a whole number.
We multiplied as follows:
Using this understanding, multiply \(\frac{5}{4} \times \frac{3}{2}\).
First, let us represent \(\frac{3}{2}\), taking the unit square as the whole.
Since the fraction \(\frac{3}{2}\) is one whole and a half, it can be seen as follows:
Following the steps of multiplication, we need to first divide this fraction \(\frac{3}{2}\) into 4 equal parts. It can be done as shown in the Fig., with the yellow shaded region representing the fraction obtained by dividing \(\frac{3}{2}\) into 4 equal parts. What is its value?
We see that the whole is divided into 2 rows and 4 columns, creating 2 × 4 = 8 equal parts.
Number of parts shaded = 3.
So the yellow shaded part = 3
Now, the next step is multiplying this result by 5.
This gives the product of \(\frac{5}{4}\) and \(\frac{3}{2}\): \(\frac{5}{4} \times \frac{3}{2}=5 \times \frac{3}{8}=\frac{15}{8}\)
Connection between the Area of a Rectangle and Fraction Multiplication
In the figure, what is the length and breadth of the shaded rectangle?
Since we started with a unit square (of side 1 unit), the length and breadth are \(\frac{1}{2}\) unit and \(\frac{1}{4}\) unit.
What is the area of this rectangle? We see that 8 such rectangles give the square of the area 1 square unit. So, the area of each rectangle is \(\frac{1}{8}\) square units.
Do you see any relation between the area and the product of length and breadth?
The area of a rectangle with fractional sides equals the product of its sides.
In general, if we want to find the product of two fractions, we can find the area of the rectangle formed with the two fractions as its sides.
Now, find \(\frac{1}{12} \times \frac{1}{18}\).
Doing this by representing the fractions using a unit square is cumbersome.
Let us find the product by observing what we did in the above cases.
In each case, the whole is divided into rows and columns.
The number of rows is the denominator of the multiplicand, which is 18 in this case.
The number of columns is the denominator of the multiplier, which is 12 in this case.
Thus, the whole is divided into 18 × 12 equal parts.
So, \(\frac{1}{18} \times \frac{1}{12}=\frac{1}{(18 \times 12)}=\frac{1}{216}\)
Thus, when two fractional units are multiplied, their product is \(\frac{1}{\text { (product of denominators)}}\)
We express this as \(\frac{1}{b} \times \frac{1}{d}=\frac{1}{b \times d}\)
Multiplying Numerators and Denominators
Now, find \(\frac{5}{12} \times \frac{7}{18}\).
Like the previous case, let us find the product by performing the multiplication step by step.
First, the whole is divided into 18 rows and 12 columns, creating 12 × 18 equal parts.
The value we get by dividing \(\frac{7}{18}\) into 12 equal parts is \(\frac{7}{(12 \times 18)}\).
Then, we multiply this result by 5 to get the product.
This is \(\frac{(5 \times 7)}{(12 \times 18)}\).
So, \(\frac{5}{12} \times \frac{7}{8}=\frac{(5 \times 7)}{(12 \times 18)}=\frac{35}{216}\)
From this, we can see that, in general,
\(\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a \times c}{b \times d}\)
This formula was first stated in this general form by Brahmagupta in his Brahmasphutasiddhanta in 628 CE.
The formula above works even when the multiplier or multiplicand is a whole number. We can simply rewrite the whole number as a fraction with a denominator of 1.
For example, 3 × \(\frac{3}{4}\) can be written \(\frac{3}{1} \times \frac{3}{4}\) = \(\frac{3 \times 3}{1 \times 4}=\frac{9}{4}\).
And, \(\frac{3}{5}\) × 4 can be written \(\frac{3}{5} \times \frac{4}{1}\) = \(\frac{3 \times 4}{5 \times 1}=\frac{12}{5}\).
Multiplication of Fractions — Simplifying to Lowest Form
Multiply the following fractions and express the product in its lowest form:
\(\frac{12}{7} \times \frac{5}{24}\)
Instead of multiplying the numerators (12 and 5) and denominators (7 and 24) first and then simplifying, we could do the following:
We see that both the circled numbers have a common factor of 12. We know that a fraction remains the same when the numerator and denominator are divided by the common factor.
In this case, we can divide them by 12.
Let us use the same technique to do one more multiplication.
When multiplying fractions, we can first divide the numerator and denominator by their common factors before multiplying the numerators and denominators. This is called cancelling the common factors.
A Pinch of History
In India, the process of reducing a fraction to its lowest terms — known as apavartana — is so well known that it fids mention even in a non-mathematical work. A Jaina scholar Umasvati (c. 150 CE) used it as a simile in a philosophical work.
Is the Product Always Greater than the Numbers Multiplied?
Since we know that when a number is multiplied by 1, the product remains unchanged, we will look at multiplying pairs of numbers where neither of them is 1.
When we multiply two counting numbers greater than 1, say 3 and 5, the product is greater than both the numbers being multiplied.
3 × 5 = 15
The product, 15, is more than both 3 and 5.
But what happens when we multiply \(\frac{1}{4}\) and 8?
\(\frac{1}{4}\) × 8 = 2
In the above multiplication, the product, 2, is greater than \(\frac{1}{4}\), but less than 8.
What happens when we multiply \(\frac{3}{4}\) and \(\frac{2}{5}\)?
\(\frac{3}{4} \times \frac{2}{5}=\frac{6}{20}\)
Let us compare this product \(\frac{6}{20}\) with the numbers \(\frac{3}{4}\) and \(\frac{2}{5}\).
For this, let us express \(\frac{3}{4}\) as \(\frac{15}{20}\) and \(\frac{2}{5}\) as \(\frac{8}{20}\).
From this, we can see that the product is less than both numbers.
When do you think the product is greater than both the numbers multiplied, when is it in between the two numbers, and when is it smaller than both?
[Hint: The relationship between the product and the numbers multiplied depends on whether they are between 0 and 1 or they are greater than 1. Take different pairs of numbers and observe their product. For each multiplication, consider the following questions.]
Create more such examples for each situation and observe the relationship between the product and the numbers being multiplied.
Order of Multiplication
We know that \(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{8}\).
Now, what is \(\frac{1}{4} \times \frac{1}{2}\)?
That is \(\frac{1}{8}\) too.
In general, note that the area of a rectangle remains the same even if the length and breadth are interchanged.
The order of multiplication does not matter. Thus,
\(\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{c}{d}=\frac{c}{d} \times \frac{a}{b}\)
This can also be seen from Brahmagupta’s formula for multiplying fractions.
Division of Fractions Class 7 Notes
What is 12 ÷ 4? You know this already.
But can this problem be restated as a multiplication problem?
What should be multiplied by 4 to get 12? That is, 4 × ? = 12
We can use this technique of converting division into multiplication problems to divide fractions.
What is 1 ÷ \(\frac{2}{3}\)?
Let us rewrite this as a multiplication problem
\(\frac{2}{3}\) × ? = 1
What should be multiplied by \(\frac{2}{3}\) to get the product 1?
If we somehow cancel out the 2 and the 3, we are left with 1.
So, 1 ÷ \(\frac{2}{3}\) = \(\frac{3}{2}\).
Let us try another problem: 3 ÷ \(\frac{2}{3}\)
This is the same as \(\frac{2}{3}\) × ? = 3.
Can you find the answer?
We know what to multiply \(\frac{2}{3}\) by to get 1.
We just need to multiply that by 3 to get 3. So,
So, \(3 \div \frac{2}{3}=\frac{3}{2} \times 3=\frac{9}{2}\)
What is \(\frac{1}{5} \div \frac{1}{2}\)?
Rewriting it as a multiplication problem, we have
\(\frac{1}{2}\) × ? = \(\frac{1}{5}\)
How do we solve this?
So, \(\frac{1}{5} \div \frac{1}{2}=2 \times \frac{1}{5}=\frac{2}{5}\)
What is \(\frac{2}{3} \div \frac{3}{5}\)?
Rewriting this as multiplication, we have
\(\frac{3}{5}\) × ? = \(\frac{2}{3}\)
How will we solve this?
So, \(\frac{2}{3} \div \frac{3}{5}=\frac{5}{3} \times \frac{2}{3}=\frac{10}{9}\).
Discussion
In each of the division problems above, observe how we found the answer. Can we frame a rule that tells us how to divide two fractions?
Let us consider the previous problem.
In every division problem, we have a dividend, a divisor, and a quotient. The technique we have been using to get the quotient is:
1. First, find the number that gives 1 when multiplied by the divisor. We see that the resulting number is a fraction whose numerator is the divisor’s denominator and whose denominator is the divisor’s numerator.
For the divisor \(\frac{3}{5}\) this fraction is \(\frac{5}{3}\).
We call \(\frac{5}{3}\) the reciprocal of \(\frac{3}{5}\).
When we multiply a fraction by its reciprocal, we get 1.
So, the first step in our technique is to find the divisor’s reciprocal.
2. We then multiply the dividend by this reciprocal to get the quotient.
Summarising, to divide two fractions:
- Find the reciprocal of the divisor
- Multiply this by the dividend to get the quotient.
So, \(\frac{a}{b} \div \frac{c}{d}=\frac{d}{c} \times \frac{a}{b}=\frac{d \times a}{c \times b}\)
This can be rewritten as \(\frac{a}{b} \div \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{d}{c}=\frac{a \times d}{b \times c}\)
As with methods and formulas for addition, subtraction, and multiplication of fractions that you learnt earlier, this method and formula for division of fractions, in this general form, was first explicitly stated by Brahmagupta in his Brahmasphutasiddhanta (628 CE).
So, to evaluate, for example, \(\frac{2}{3} \div \frac{3}{5}\) using Brahmagupta’s formula above, we write \(\frac{2}{3} \div \frac{3}{5}=\frac{2}{3} \times \frac{5}{3}=\frac{2 \times 5}{3 \times 3}=\frac{10}{9}\)
Dividend, Divisor, and the Quotient
When we divide two whole numbers, say 6 ÷ 3, we get the quotient 2.
Here, the quotient is less than the dividend.
6 ÷ 3 = 2, 2 < 6
But what happens when we divide 6 by \(\frac{1}{4}\)?
6 ÷ \(\frac{1}{4}\) = 24.
Here, the quotient is greater than the dividend!
What happens when we divide \(\frac{1}{8}\) by \(\frac{1}{4}\)?
\(\frac{1}{8} \div \frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{2}\)
Here, too, the quotient is greater than the dividend.
When do you think the quotient is less than the dividend, and when is it greater than the dividend?
Is there a similar relationship between the divisor and the quotient?
Use your understanding of such relationships in multiplication to answer the questions above.
Some Problems Involving Fractions Class 7 Notes
Example 3.
Leena made 5 cups of tea. She used \(\frac{1}{4}\) litre of milk for this. How much milk is there in each cup of tea?
Leena used \(\frac{1}{4}\) litres of milk in 5 cups of tea.
So, in 1 cup of tea, the volume of milk should be \(\frac{1}{4}\) ÷ 5.
Writing this as multiplication, we have:
5 × (milk per cup) = \(\frac{1}{4}\)
We perform the division as follows, as per Brahmagupta’s method:
The reciprocal of 5 (the divisor) is \(\frac{1}{5}\).
Multiplying this reciprocal by the dividend (\(\frac{1}{4}\)), we get
\(\frac{1}{5} \times \frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{20}\)
So, each cup of tea has \(\frac{1}{20}\) litre of milk.
Example 4.
Some of the oldest examples of working with non-unit fractions occur in humanity’s oldest geometry texts, the Shulbasutra. Here is an example from Baudhayana’s Shulbasutra (c. 800 BCE).
Cover an area of 7\(\frac{1}{2}\) square units with square bricks each of whose sides is \(\frac{1}{5}\) units.
How many such square bricks are needed?
Each square brick has an area of \(\frac{1}{5} \times \frac{1}{5}=\frac{1}{25}\) square units.
The total area to be covered is 7\(\frac{1}{2}\) sq. units = \(\frac{15}{2}\) sq. units.
As (Number of bricks) × (Area of a brick) = Total Area,
Number of bricks = \(\frac{15}{2} \div \frac{1}{25}\).
The reciprocal of the divisor is 25.
Multiplying the reciprocal by the dividend, we get
\(25 \times \frac{15}{2}=\frac{25 \times 15}{2}=\frac{375}{2}\)
Example 5.
This problem was posed by Chaturveda Prithudakasvami (c. 860 CE) in his commentary on Brahmagupta’s book Brahmasphutasiddhanta.
Four fountains fill a cistern. The first fountain can fill the cistern in a day. The second can fill it in half a day. The third can fill it in a quarter of a day. The fourth can fill the cistern in one-fifth of a day. If they all flow together, in how much time will they fill the cistern?
Let us solve this problem step by step.
In a day, the number of times—
- The first fountain will fill the cistern in 1 ÷ 1 = 1
- the second fountain will fill the cistern is 1 ÷ \(\frac{1}{2}\) = 2
- the third fountain will fill the cistern is 1 ÷ \(\frac{1}{4}\) = 4
- the fourth fountain will fill the cistern is 1 ÷ \(\frac{1}{5}\) = 5
The number of times the four fountains together will fill the cistern in a day is 1 + 2 + 4 + 5 = 12.
Thus, the total time needed by the four fountains to fill the cistern together is \(\frac{1}{12}\) days.
Fractional Relations
Here is a square with some lines drawn inside.
What fraction of the area of the whole square does the shaded region occupy?
There are different ways to solve this problem. Here is one of them:
Let the area of the whole square be 1 square unit.
We can see that the top right square (in Fig.), occupies \(\frac{1}{4}\) of the area of the whole square.
Area of red square = \(\frac{1}{4}\) square units.
Let us look at this red square. The area of the triangle inside it (coloured yellow) is half the area of the red square.
So, the area of the yellow triangle = \(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{4}=\frac{1}{8}\) square units.
What fraction of this yellow triangle is shaded?
The shaded region occupies \(\frac{3}{4}\) of the area of the yellow triangle. Are you able to see why?
The area of shaded part = \(\frac{3}{4} \times \frac{1}{8}=\frac{3}{32}\) square units.
Thus, the shaded region occupies \(\frac{3}{32}\) of the area of the whole square.
In each of the figures given below, find the fraction of the big square that the shaded region occupies.
We will solve more interesting problems of this kind in a later chapter.
A Dramma-tic Donation
The following problem is translated from Bhaskaracharya’s (Bhaskara II’s) book, Lilavati, written in 1150 CE.
“O, wise one! A miser gave to a beggar \(\frac{1}{5}\) of \(\frac{1}{16}\) of \(\frac{1}{4}\) of \(\frac{1}{2}\) of \(\frac{2}{3}\) of \(\frac{3}{4}\) of a dramma. If you know the mathematics of fractions well, tell me O child, how many cowrie shells were given by the miser to the beggar.”
Dramma refers to a silver coin used in those times. The tale says that 1 dramma was equivalent to 1280 cowrie shells. Let’s see what fraction of a drama the person gave:
\(\left(\frac{1}{2} \times \frac{2}{3} \times \frac{3}{4} \times \frac{1}{5} \times \frac{1}{16} \times \frac{1}{4}\right)^{\text {th }}\) part of a dramma.
Evaluating it gives \(\frac{6}{7680}\).
Upon simplifying to its lowest form, we get \(\frac{6}{7680}=\frac{1}{1280}\)
So, one cowrie shell was given to the beggar.
You can see in the answer Bhaskaracharya’s humour! The miser had given the beggar only one coin of the least value (cowrie).
Around the 12th century, several types of coins were in use in different kingdoms of the Indian subcontinent. Most commonly used were gold coins (called dinars/gadyanas and hunas), silver coins (called drammas/tankas), copper coins (called kasus/panas and mashakas), and cowrie shells. The exact conversion rates between these coins varied depending on the region, time period, economic conditions, weights of coins and their purity.
Gold coins had high value and were used in large transactions and to store wealth. Silver coins were more commonly used in everyday transactions. Copper coins had low value and were used in smaller transactions. Cowrie shells were the lowest denomination and were used in very small transactions and as change.
If we assume 1 gold dinar = 12 silver drammas, 1 silver dramma = 4 copper panas, 1 copper pana = 6 mashakas, and 1 pana = 30 cowrie shells,
1 copper pana = \(\frac{1}{48}\) gold dinar (\(\frac{1}{12} \times \frac{1}{4}\))
1 cowrie shell = \(\frac{1}{120}\) copper panas
1 cowrie shell = \(\frac{1}{360}\) gold dinar
A Pinch of History
As you have seen, fractions are an important type of number, playing a critical role in a variety of everyday problems that involve sharing and dividing quantities equally. The general notion of non-unit fractions as we use them today, equipped with the arithmetic operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division, was developed largely in India. The ancient Indian geometry texts called the Shulbasutra, which go back as far as 800 BCE, and were concerned with the construction of fire altars for rituals, used general non-unit fractions extensively, including performing division of such fractions as we saw in Example 3.
Fractions even became commonplace in the popular culture of India as far back as 150 BCE, as evidenced by an offhand reference to the reduction of fractions to lowest terms in the philosophical work of the revered Jain scholar Umasvati.
General rules for performing arithmetic operations on fractions — in essentially the modern form in which we carry them out today — were first codified by Brahmagupta in his Brahmasphutasiddhanta in 628 CE. We have already seen his methods for adding and subtracting general fractions. For multiplying general fractions, Brahmagupta wrote:
“Multiplication of two or more fractions is obtained by taking the product of the numerators divided by the product of the denominators.” (Brahmasphutasiddhanta, Verse 12.1.3)
That is, \(\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a \times c}{b \times d}\)
For division of general fractions, Brahmagupta wrote:
“The division of fractions is performed by interchanging the numerator and denominator of the divisor; the numerator of the dividend is then multiplied by the (new) numerator, and the denominator by the (new) denominator.”
Bhaskara II, in his book Lilavati in 1150 CE, clarifies Brahmagupta‘s statement further in terms of the notion of reciprocal:
“Division of one fraction by another is equivalent to multiplication of the first fraction by the reciprocal of the second.” (Lilavati, Verse 2.3.40)
Both of these verses are equivalent to the formula:
\(\frac{a}{b} \div \frac{c}{d}=\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{d}{c}=\frac{a \times d}{b \times c}\)
Bhaskara I, in his 629 CE commentary Aryabhatiyabhashya on Aryabhata’s 499 CE work, described the geometric interpretation of multiplication of fractions (that we saw earlier) in terms of the division of a square into rectangles via equal divisions along the length and breadth.
Many other Indian mathematicians, such as Shridharacharya (c. 750 CE), Mahaviracharya (c. 850 CE), Caturveda Prithudakasvami (c. 860 CE), and Bhaskara II (c. 1150 CE) developed the usage of arithmetic of fractions significantly further.
The Indian theory of fractions and arithmetic operations on them was transmitted to, and its usage developed further, by Arab and African mathematicians such as al-Hassar (c. 1192 CE) of Morocco. The theory was then transmitted to Europe via the Arabs over the next few centuries, and came into general use in Europe in only around the 17th century, after which it spread worldwide. The theory is indeed indispensable today in modern mathematics.
Class 7 Maths Notes
The post Working with Fractions Class 7 Notes Maths Chapter 8 appeared first on Learn CBSE.